RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05524
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
His duty history be amended to reflect Deputy Commander,
92nd Mission Support Group (MSG) rather than Deputy Commander,
92nd Logistics Readiness Squadron (LRS).
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
While he was not directly assigned to the MSG, and his duty
history reflects he served as the Deputy Commander for the LRS, he
served as the Deputy Commander for the MSG for several months
before his move to the US European Command. Furthermore, the LRS
does not have a Deputy Commander position.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
The applicant is currently serving on active duty in the grade of
lieutenant colonel (O-5).
The applicants duty history during the period in question, as
reflected in the Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS), is as
follows:
EFFECTIVE DATE ORG DUTY TITLE
28 Aug 06 92nd LRS Director, Air Exped Force Cell
*14 May 08 92nd LRS Deputy Commander
27 Sep 08 AFELM Joint Logistics Planner
*contested duty title
The applicants performance report rendered for the period
26 Aug 07 through 10 Sep 08 reflects he was assigned to the 92nd
LRS with duty at the 92nd MSG as Deputy Commander. The Overall
Rater Assessment by the then MSG commander includes the following
bullet: Incredible...period! Seamless leadership in my absence;
handpicked for tough EUCOM J3/5 job...follow w/SDE!
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
AFPC/DPALL recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an
error or an injustice. The applicant was assigned to the 92nd LRS
from 3 Aug 05 through 27 Sep 08 and served as the acting commander
for six months while the commander was deployed. He also
performed duties at the MSG from Aug 06 through Sep 08.
In order to be released for a deputy commander position in the 21R
(Logistics Readiness Officer) career field, a service member must
be a graduated squadron commander who has completed senior
development education (SDE). The applicant did not meet these
requirements during the reporting period in question and there is
no record of him being hired for the position.
However, if the decision is to grant the relief sought, the
records should be corrected to show the duty title of "Interim
Deputy Commander, 92 Mission Support Group" for the duration of
his attachment to the 92nd Mission Support Group, Fairchild AFB,
14 May 08 to 27 Sep 08.
A complete copy of the AFPC/DPALL evaluation is at Exhibit C.
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant
on 9 Jun 14 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). As
of this date, no response has been received by this office.
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing
law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate
the existence of an injustice warranting partial relief. The
applicant contends during his assignment with the 92nd Logistics
Readiness Squadron he served as the deputy commander for the
Mission Support Group for several months during the period 26 Aug
07 through 10 Sep 08 and his duty history should therefore be
changed accordingly. While we note the comments of AFPC/DPALL
indicating that the applicant was not qualified to serve as a
permanent deputy commander position in his career field as he was
not a graduated squadron commander who had completed senior
development education (SDE), we believe some measure of relief is
warranted. In this respect, we note the applicants performance
report for the period 26 Aug 07 thru 10 Sep 08, indicates that he
provided seamless leadership during the commanders absence,
therefore, while we dont disagree with the determination of the
OPR that the applicant was not qualified to hold the permanent
position of Deputy Mission Support Group Commander, we believe it
would be appropriate to correct the applicants records to reflect
that he served as the interim deputy mission support group
commander as noted in his officer performance report during the
group commanders absence. Therefore, we recommend the
applicants records be corrected as indicated below.
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force
relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show his duty title,
effective 14 May 2008, as reflected in his duty history in the
Military Personnel Data System (MilPDS), be corrected to reflect
Interim Deputy Commander, 92nd Mission Support Group, Fairchild
AFB.
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number
BC-2013-05524 in Executive Session on 11 Dec 14 under the
provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
Although Ms. Young chaired the panel, in view of her
unavailability, Mr. Janosov has agreed to sign as Acting Panel
Chair. All members voted to correct the records as recommended.
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 25 Nov 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPALL, dated 7 Jan 14.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Jun 14.
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-04023
Regarding the applicants allegation that his PRF had no input from the unit he was transferred to, the Wing Commander points out the applicant was only assigned to the new unit on a short-term basis after he was removed as commander of the LRS. Additionally, this new information is also inconsistent with the actions of both the Wing and MSG commanders to support his candidacy for the Air Reserve Technician (ART) (full-time) LRS commander position during the matter under review. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03429
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-03429 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 12 MAY 07 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her records be corrected to reflect she was awarded the Meritorious Unit Award (MUA) and the Air Force Outstanding Unit Award (AFOUA) with eight Oak Leaf Clusters (OLCs). ...
Her request for senior rater endorsement on the EPR should not be granted at this time. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the Air Force evaluations and provides the wing commander’s concurrence of her request for senior rater indorsement. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice to warrant amending the MSM citation to include...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 00350
According to the 99 ABW Commanders letter dated 4 Dec 13, she was issued a written no-contact order on 8 Feb 13 by the First Sergeant to stay away from another member of the 99 LRS per a request from Security Forces investigators because the applicant was discussing the open investigation with the said person. The complete DPSOE evaluation is at Exhibit D. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 28 Jul 14, copies of...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 03807
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2007-03807 INDEX CODE: 107.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ _ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States, Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect award of the Combat Crew Badge (CCB) and if applicable, the Combat Readiness Medal (CRM). The complete AFPC/DPSIDR...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-03165
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) and the United States Central Command Air Forces (USCENTAF) failed to update his duty history to reflect his command in Baghdad from 19 Apr to 30 Jun 03, even though he held the position for more than sixty days. A review of the OPRs included in the applicants record for the CY06A Board, reflect overall ratings of meets standards. The applicant has six...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2006-02253
The DPPPEP complete evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPPPO recommends denial. The DPPPO complete evaluation, with attachment, is at Exhibit D. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The applicant reviewed the evaluation and states his record of performance demonstrates he’s ready for the responsibilities of lieutenant colonel. Notwithstanding the above, we find sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05912
In addition, the Department of Defense Inspector General (IG DoD/MRI) concurred with the determination, approved the report, and substantiated the allegations (Exhibit B). We note that based on the Report of Investigation (ROI) from the SAF/IG the applicant was the victim of reprisal under the Whistleblower Protection Act (10 USC 1034) by his former commander who denied his reenlistment and attendance at the Chief Executive Course (CEC). Other than the comments in the ROI, the applicant...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-00735
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-00735 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: YES ___________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1. In Sep 06, he applied to the Air Force Materiel Command (AFMC) Commanding Officer Selection Board; however, in Oct 06, his commander returned from the selection board and advised him that his name would not be on the list. In addition,...
At the time applicant was considered for promotion to the grade of lieutenant colonel by the CY98B board, his OSB reflected his duty title as Commander, DDD Letterkenny, effective 26 Jun 97. The next duty entry of 960613 was changed to reflect information on the next OPR of record. A complete copy of the Air Force evaluation is attached at Exhibit C. The Chief, Supply Officer Assignments, AFPC/DPASL, reviewed this application and indicated that regarding applicant’s request to change his...